Windows Experience Index: Vista vs. 7

by Alec on January 11, 2009

One of the claims that Microsoft makes about Windows 7 is that it performs better than Windows Vista.  Riddle me this, then…  why does the Windows 7 Experience Index for the same PC differ so radically under the different operating systems?  The following images were snapped on the same hardware, but booted with either operating system.

These are the Windows 7 scores.

image

These are the Windows Vista scores.

image

Windows 7 rates the processor and memory higher than Windows Vista, but the 3D performance and hard disk transfer rate lower. 

It’s a mystery. 

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

Noah January 12, 2009 at 2:26 am

I get the same thing. My graphics rating (Radeon 4850) was 5.9 in Vista and now it’s a 7.9. My processor (Q6600) rating was a 5.5, now it’s 3.9.

Reply

Rick Claus January 12, 2009 at 12:34 pm

Your disk score is your lowest, resulting in a lower overall score. It’s a beta 1 release, probably a driver issue for IO priority or something. I bet the system has a generic driver in for your disk subsystem.

Have you opened up Windows Update to include OtherUpdates?

Rick
http://twitter.com/rickster_cdn

Reply

Alec January 12, 2009 at 12:43 pm

Yup. Windows update reports that it’s all up to date. I’m sure your right, Rick, that it’s a beta 1 driver of some kind. I’ll just have to hang tight until there’s an update.

Reply

Sprinx January 13, 2009 at 2:35 pm

@Noah:
5.9 was the max possible score in Vista, hence the change there. The Win7 max is 7.9. My Nvidia 7800 GTX on my home PC gets a 5.9/5.8 in Vista, as well, and I’m sure your Radeon 4850 outperforms it considerably. Not sure about the processor change – probably just a “beta” issue. My “gaming graphics” score took a dive in Win 7, to 3 something, I think, but the “Aero” stayed about the same.

I have a 2×200 GB RAID 1 array on my Dell Precision 380 at work, and my hard disk rate score dropped from a 5.9 in Vista to a 2.0 in Win 7. I’m guessing that must be a driver issue w/ the older ICH7R chipset.

It seems to be running smoothly, though. Haven’t had a BSD or lockup yet.

Reply

Jim Reece January 15, 2009 at 11:29 pm

Drive scores drag down everybody, if you want a jump turn off write caching, a rating of 3.0 will probably jump to 5.5, 6.0 if it’s a SATA drive

Reply

RECONBWARE January 21, 2009 at 5:21 am

I’m also running a raid0 array – striping and my hard drive shows as a 5.9 out of 7

http://americanpridebt.googlepages.com/windows7systemspecs.jpg

Reply

Bharath Ram June 29, 2010 at 1:08 am

My ratings in windows 7 are

7.5, 7.5, 7.0 and 7.0 in the usual order.

Only let down by the hard disk (which is the max I can have) at 5.9

Why do the base scores need to be the lowest?

Why can’t it be the average?

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post:

Calliflower on Twitter Calliflower on Facebook Calliflower on Youtube Calliflower RSS Feed Contact Us